by Richard Lyon
When I was growing up in a small town in Alabama in the 1950s, the
only word ever used for something that might be called same-sex
attraction or homosexuality was "queer." Of course, it always carried a
very negative and hateful connotation. I can still remember cringing at
the thought that it was probably I whom they were talking about. Just as
other people have come to embrace negative slang like "dyke" and
"faggot" to throw the words back, I have learned to embrace "queer."
That definitely takes the sting out of those memories.
However, unlike the other slang terms, "queer" has come to be used by
many people in a way that serves a useful purpose of inclusiveness.
There are people who want to take any word that has ever been used in a
nasty manner and declare it unfit for all polite discourse and
conversation. One particularly problematic example of that is the
notion, which I have encountered on several occasions, that because the
religious right is fond of referring to "the homosexual agenda," then
the word "homosexual" should never be used for any purpose. They don't
seem to think that "agenda" and the definite article should go by the
wayside.
"Homosexual" is a word that has good and appropriate usages in
medical and scientific contexts.
The media have adopted "gay" as a generic term that is loosely
applied to a wide range of people with nontraditional sexual or gender
identities. This is as objectionable as the traditional practice of
making masculine pronouns the default for English usage. Both of these
practices are not going to disappear anytime soon, but that doesn't mean
that I have to follow them.
The acronym "LGBT" has come into usage as something of a stopgap
measure. Most people use it to stand for "lesbian, gay, bisexual,
transgender." There have been various discussions about people who are
attracted by and attached to this movement that are not included under
those four terms. That has resulted in the acronym being extended to
"LGBTQQIA." The last four letters are for "queer, questioning, intersex,
ally." Although I agree with the spirit of inclusiveness, the acronym
becomes completely unworldly. Any acronym is like hitting a speed bump
when you are trying to write coherent prose.
MORE!
No comments:
Post a Comment